Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #43398Re: fooling the AT drive table.
From: Tim Bowser
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 1990 07:27
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 1990 07:27
44 lines
2499 bytes
2499 bytes
root@scona (sysop) writes:
> Is there a way to modify the AT drive just after it
> is copied from ROM to RAM? I've got a CDC 94155-87 HD
> that I want to add and the drive specs don't match
> closely enough to any entry in the AT drive table.
> I'm not a big fan of ROM upgrades, or reburning ROM
> chips, so anything that can be done via a device driver
> or something would be perfect.
> Thanks.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>"This, of course, is impossible..." - Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
> root@scona.UUCP ...!edm!scona!root cwirun@uncanet.BITNET
> cwirun@ucnet.ucalgary.ca
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just demonstrated to myself that the ROM BIOS on the Western Digital
AT-compatible controller will do the job you asked. I run RLL drives
almost exclusively, and the generic AMI BIOS doesn't support the 26
sector drive tables for RLL. Since the following is dangerous to your
data, please have a current backup before attempting this.
If you have a Western Digital controller in the 1003V-1006V range,
there is a good chance it has the onboard ROM BIOS for drive
installation. Using your fave version of DEBUG, type g=cc00:5 at the
prompt. You should get a menu of options, such as low-level format,
surface analyses (sic) and interleave settings. The BIOS also contains
46 drive tables plus a user-configurable 47th for those odd ducks out
there. Again, DO NOT TRY it unless you have current backups of the
drive! One slip, and the partition table is blown away. I know, I did
it...
Hope this helps someone...
--
Tim Bowser ("Strikemaster") | Standard | mailrus!sharkey!clmqt!strike
Enterprise Information System | Disclaimer | strike@clmqt.marquette.Mi.US
Marquette, Mi. USA | Here | Voice:(906)-346-6735
=> UNIX: The Adventure Begins... To vi, or not to vi, that is the question. <=
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1671@clmqt.marquette.Mi.US>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!yale!umich!sharkey!clmqt!strikeReferences:
<99wXe2w160w@scona>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!yale!umich!sharkey!clmqt!strike From: strike@clmqt.marquette.Mi.US (Tim Bowser) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: fooling the AT drive table. Message-ID: <1671@clmqt.marquette.Mi.US> Date: 3 Mar 90 07:27:52 GMT References: <99wXe2w160w@scona> Organization: Enterprise Information System, Marquette, MI Lines: 44