Re: Expanded Memory Emulators, an opinions?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #43702

#43702

From: Brent Besler
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 1990 18:36

7 lines
875 bytes

I QEMM 4.23.  I works perfectly fine after some twesking and experimenting 
around.  PC Magazine just did a review of the new QEMM 5.0.  They liked it
slightly better than 386 to the Max.  I would read the review.  I have never 
used any emulators besides QEMM, so I can't really give a qualified 
review of differences.

                                                Brent H. Besler

Technical Details

Message-ID: <290@vela.acs.oakland.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!umich!vela!bbesler

References: <881@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!umich!vela!bbesler
From: bbesler@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Brent Besler)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Expanded Memory Emulators, an opinions?
Keywords: EMS QEMM
Message-ID: <290@vela.acs.oakland.edu>
Date: 8 Mar 90 18:36:51 GMT
References: <881@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM>
Reply-To: bbesler@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Brent Besler)
Distribution: na
Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message