Re: Expanded Memory Emulators, an opinions?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #43791

#43791

From: Confusion Reigns
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 1990 19:39

8 lines
958 bytes

In article <29431@amdcad.AMD.COM> phil@pepsi.AMD.COM (Phil Ngai) writes:
>386Max is in my opinion superior because they can loadhi device drivers
>like Sun PC-NFS sockdrv.sys which QEMM-386 can not. I have not done
>this but people say it works.

What do you mean by this?  In case people get the wrong impression, QEMM CAN
loadhi device drivers.  You just use loadhi.sys rather than loadhi.com.  Is
there something special about sockdrv.sys that only 386Max can handle?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5060@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!jmerrill

References: <881@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM> <29431@amdcad.AMD.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!jmerrill
From: jmerrill@jarthur.Claremont.EDU (Confusion Reigns)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Expanded Memory Emulators, an opinions?
Keywords: EMS QEMM
Message-ID: <5060@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: 9 Mar 90 19:39:02 GMT
References: <881@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM> <29431@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message