Re: Multisync Monitors

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #43825

#43825

From: Doug McDonald
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 1990 01:39

10 lines
895 bytes

In article <1640073@hpspcoi.HP.COM> dlow@hpspcoi.HP.COM (Danny Low) writes:
>
>The NEC 2A has no problems other than the fact that it is NOT a multisync
>monitor. 

Not true. The ones I have seen (several) have had poor convergence
and a generally poor image. Everyone I know who has gotten one
has sent it back. I sent one back. Not a good endorsement.

Doug McDonald

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Mar10.013911.21664@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!iuvax!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!aries!mcdonald

References: <5673@ur-cc.UUCP> <1640073@hpspcoi.HP.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!iuvax!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!aries!mcdonald
From: mcdonald@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (Doug McDonald)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Multisync Monitors
Message-ID: <1990Mar10.013911.21664@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 10 Mar 90 01:39:11 GMT
References: <5673@ur-cc.UUCP> <1640073@hpspcoi.HP.COM>
Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Reply-To: mcdonald@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (Doug McDonald)
Organization: School of Chemical Sciences, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message