Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #43835Conflict between 386MAX and FASTOPEN? (and which EMM is best)
From: John Wright/Dr. Pat Lane
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 1990 22:30
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 1990 22:30
56 lines
3224 bytes
3224 bytes
I have a small problem with 386-to-the-Max, ver 4.05 running on my 386/25
with C&T Neat chipset, AMI BIOS and MS-DOS 4.01.
Since installing 386MAX, I have been getting occasional "Priveledged
operation exception error" which brings the machine to a crashing halt
from which it must be cold booted.
These are seemingly random, always occcuring during a disk access,
I suspect, opens-for-read. Since I've been recording them, the address
given for the error has always been the same spot in FASTOPEN (CS:031B).
It seems to happen more often when FASTOPEN is in high memory. The code
at that address appears to be harmless enough (MOV DI,ES:BP, I think).
Qualitas tech support suggested I not try to make DOS4 use expanded
memory for BUFFERS= or FASTOPEN and leave off DOS4 on the 386MAX stmt
(apparently, in their opinion, MSDOS 4.01 still hasn't got it right
when it comes to expanded memory).
Well, I did that and I still get the errors. Any ideas?
Oddly enough, I get the errors fairly frequently while another fellow
that uses the machine as much as I do *never* gets them. About all I
can figure that we do differently is I keep the *Num Lock* off, he keeps
it on! Figure that one!
Thanks as always for any help.
Re the debate on EMS managers:
I only have experience to speak of with 386MAX and dispite the above, I'm
impressed with it as a well designed, professionally supported and very
useful utility. The documentation is fairly good which is always nice.
In article <29431@amdcad.AMD.COM> phil@pepsi.AMD.COM (Phil Ngai) writes:
>386Max is in my opinion superior because they can loadhi device drivers
>like Sun PC-NFS sockdrv.sys which QEMM-386 can not. I have not done
>this but people say it works.
I thought it was the other way around: I think QEMM can LOADHI device
drivers but 386MAX (regular version) definately cannot. However, for
$55US you can upgrade your 386MAX to "386 Professional" which does
load device drivers (they told me they expect to stop selling the
"non Professional" version in a few months).
I wonder if either QEMM or 386PRO can "loadhi" programs installed with
INSTALL= in the CONFIG.SYS. Would be useful for SHARE.EXE.
I guess one thing about 386 EMM's that everybody aggrees on is that the
one supplied with DOS 4.x sucks!
--
John Wright ////////////////// Phone: 902-424-3805 or 902-424-6527
Post: c/o Dr Pat Lane, Biology Dept, Dalhousie U, Halifax N.S., CANADA B3H-4H8
Cdn/Eannet:lane@cs.dal.cdn Uucp:lane@dalcs.uucp or {uunet watmath}!dalcs!lane
Arpa:lane%dalcs.uucp@uunet.uu.net Internet:lane@cs.dal.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Mar9.223031.4873@cs.dal.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!uunet!cs.dal.ca!laneShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!uunet!cs.dal.ca!lane From: lane@cs.dal.ca (John Wright/Dr. Pat Lane) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Conflict between 386MAX and FASTOPEN? (and which EMM is best) Keywords: EMS QEMM 386MAX DOS4 FASTOPEN Message-ID: <1990Mar9.223031.4873@cs.dal.ca> Date: 9 Mar 90 22:30:31 GMT Reply-To: lane@cs.dal.ca.UUCP (John Wright/Dr. Pat Lane) Distribution: na Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada Lines: 56