Re: Word for Windows

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #43957

#43957

From: Mike Dahmus
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 1990 20:25

9 lines
998 bytes

PC Magazine raved over both Word for Windows and Ami Professional in a recent
issue (don't remember which number).
They basically said that Word for Windows is, in their opinion, the *easiest
to use* word processor out there with that level of features. They thought
Ami Pro was also great, but not quite as great as WFW.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Michael E. Dahmus     | "Stupid people and Macintoshes - it takes a  |
| MXD118 @ PSUVM        |  crowbar to separate 'em!"                   |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <90071.152533MXD118@psuvm.psu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!mxd118

References: <4377@mace.cc.purdue.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!mxd118
From: MXD118@psuvm.psu.edu (Mike Dahmus)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Word for Windows
Message-ID: <90071.152533MXD118@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: 12 Mar 90 20:25:33 GMT
References: <4377@mace.cc.purdue.edu>
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message