🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #44041

Re: MFM on RLL?

#44041
From: Paul Caskey
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 1990 04:17
27 lines
1623 bytes
On 13 Mar 90 21:28:01 GMT,
paravia@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark David Kakatsch) said:

Mark> Can an MFM drive be connected to an RLL controller? I can get a
Mark> 40Mbyte MFM drive for free, but I've got a '386 w/ an 65Mbyte
Mark> RLL. (Gateway). I know that MFM is pretty slow for a 386, but
Mark> since it would be free, I wouldn't mind...Thanks much.

Very simply, the answer is: "No, not reliably."  IOW, go for it. :-)
RLL is tough on drives.  If you have a drive that's made for MFM, but
it's really tough, it may handle RLL.  For instance, my roommate
recently got an old DEC Rainbow with a 10 meg MFM drive.  That
computer and the drive in it had been sitting in a snow bank for a
week before he bought it.  I have a feeling it could probably handle
RLL.

However, for the average PC drive, chances are that if it was built
tough enough to be an RLL, it *would* be an RLL.  Therefore I suspect
that forcing an MFM to do RLL is pretty risky.

--
/*********/
     Paul Caskey
     pcaskey@ariel.unm.edu
     Only lawyers represent anyone's ideas but their own.
                                                  /*********/
Technical Details
Message-ID: <SORC.90Mar13211725@carina.unm.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!unmvax!ariel!ariel.unm.edu!sorc
References: <2881@uwm.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!unmvax!ariel!ariel.unm.edu!sorc
From: sorc@carina.unm.edu (Paul Caskey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: MFM on RLL?
Message-ID: <SORC.90Mar13211725@carina.unm.edu>
Date: 14 Mar 90 04:17:25 GMT
References: <2881@uwm.edu>
Sender: news@ariel.unm.edu
Distribution: comp
Organization: The Village
Lines: 27
In-reply-to: paravia@csd4.csd.uwm.edu's message of 13 Mar 90 21:28:01 GMT