Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #7949Re: Summary: Should I upgrade Zortech C++
From: Mark McWiggins
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 1989 00:27
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 1989 00:27
24 lines
1414 bytes
1414 bytes
toma@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Tom Almy) writes: >Well, I wasn't exactly flooded with responses, three to be exact. >One promoted his companies C++ front end (Intek C++, $495), which is fine >but I am really interested in a true compiler (which should be able to >generate better code??). *ahem* 'twas I ... No, a true compiler should be *faster in compiling* and probably easier to debug, but the quality of generated code when using a C++ translator then depends upon the underlying C compiler. A translator then gives you choice of the processor for which you generate code, as well: 8088 or 80386 or 34010, or whatever C compiler you have. No doubt native-code compilers will come to predominate in coming years, but for the moment Cfront certainly has a niche to fill. And obviously I'm totally prejudiced on this point ... -- Mark McWiggins Integration Technologies, Inc. (Intek) +1 206 455 9935 DISCLAIMER: I could be wrong ... 1400 112th Ave SE #202 Bellevue WA 98004 uunet!intek01!mark Ask me about C++!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<252@intek01.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!pilchuck!amc-gw!nwnexus!intek01!markReferences:
<6427@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!pilchuck!amc-gw!nwnexus!intek01!mark From: mark@intek01.UUCP (Mark McWiggins) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Summary: Should I upgrade Zortech C++ Message-ID: <252@intek01.UUCP> Date: 2 Dec 89 00:27:05 GMT References: <6427@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> Organization: Integration Technologies Inc. (Intek), Bellevue WA Lines: 24