Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Article #26244Re: Binaries: ARC vs PKARC vs ZOO
From: Forrest Gehrke
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 1988 17:23
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 1988 17:23
11 lines
905 bytes
905 bytes
In article <230@unsvax.UUCP>, tlhingan@unsvax.UUCP (Eugene Tramaglino) writes: > > Personal Note: I cannot stand pkarc. I prefer ARC's one (1) program > that does the job just as well. I don't like invoking different > commands to 'v' an archive and 'e' an archive. Apparently you have not had the boredom of waiting for a couple dozen small files being archived by SEA's ARC--it's almost like watching paint dry. PKARC does it at least 5 times faster. Forrest Gehrke
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<24494@clyde.ATT.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!fegReferences:
<23699@clyde.ATT.COM> <1805@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <1685@polyslo.UUCP> <230@unsvax.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!feg From: feg@clyde.ATT.COM (Forrest Gehrke) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Binaries: ARC vs PKARC vs ZOO Summary: It depends on how long you sit Message-ID: <24494@clyde.ATT.COM> Date: 7 Apr 88 17:23:46 GMT References: <23699@clyde.ATT.COM> <1805@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <1685@polyslo.UUCP> <230@unsvax.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Whippany NJ Lines: 11