Re: Seagates under Unix??? (or best pick)

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc

Article #8809

#8809

From: Erik Ohrnberger
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1990 15:08

11 lines
1015 bytes

I have had nothing but good experiences with three or
four that I know of.  20 MB one in a 9 MHz IBM AT run
for four years continusly before it coughed a bad sector.  30MB one has run for three years without a new
bad sector.  I have an ST-251-1 (40MB) at home that's been
running for 1.5 years without a hitch.  It's partitioned as DOS/SCO.  less than 27ms seek avg.  I'm also looking to upgrade the diskspace, so I'd like to know
if there are any problems with the Seagate 80MB.


-- 
-->Erik Ch. Ohrnberger
-->Permanently Refraining from un-informed opinions

Technical Details

Message-ID: <822@edstip.EDS.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!ox.com!oxtrap!teemc!edsews!edstip!ohrnb

References: <40970028@hpindda.HP.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!ox.com!oxtrap!teemc!edsews!edstip!ohrnb
From: ohrnb@edstip.EDS.COM (Erik Ohrnberger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Seagates under Unix???  (or best pick)
Summary: seagates berry berry good to me!
Message-ID: <822@edstip.EDS.COM>
Date: 16 Jan 90 15:08:47 GMT
References: <40970028@hpindda.HP.COM>
Organization: EDS - Tech Pubs, Bloomfield Hills, MI
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message