Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1160Re: Aplha vs. Pentium
From: Rob Young
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:06
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:06
44 lines
2645 bytes
2645 bytes
In <00965E8C.5E07CBC0@vms.csd.mu.edu> 2760carpente@vms.csd.mu.edu writes:
> This question has been bugging me for a while and so I finally decided to post
> it. The new chip from DEC (Alhpa) is going to run Windows NT along with VMS
> and UNIX. If a 'Alpha' PC is running Windows NT, will this PC be faster than a
> 'Pentium' PC running Windows. I mean, are these CPU's comparable...? I am
> assuming that the Alpha PC will be better and faster... Any comments..
> Benchmarks..
> Have a great new year everyone..
> __ ___ __ ___ __
> \ / | \ | Vinny Carpenter | It takes a big man to
> \ / | \ | Marquette University | cry. It takes an even
> / | | \ | 2760carpente@vms.csd.mu.edu| bigger man to laugh at
> / | | | vcarpent@nyx.cs.du.edu | that man -Jack Handey
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking at pg. 59, Digital News & Review from November 23, 1992:
"Our Alpha systems are going to match the price point of the Pentium
systems on a head-to-head basis," promises Bill Storey, DEC's program
Manager for Windows NT.
...
"In order to take full advantage of the superscalar elements of the
Intel chip, developers will have to recompile their existing Windows
applications, contends Jesse Lipcon, DEC's entry-level systems group
vice-president. "At that point, we'll say they should port to
Alpha AXP because we'll offer two to three times the performance,"
he [Lipcon] says.
2x performance at the same price point. If the emulation is decent, Alpha
PC's might make a small dent in the x86 market share. If you are a developer,
why not Alpha? (Assuming your favorite tools can port, etc....). Minimal
flamage please, thanks.
Rob
young@tattoo.cs.widener.edu
"Drawn like moths we drift into the city, the timeless old attraction. Cruising
for the action. Lit up like a firefly, just to feel the living night."
-- Neil Peart
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1hvjrpINN5i8@cs.widener.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!cs.widener.edu!cs.widener.edu!usenetReferences:
<00965E8C.5E07CBC0@vms.csd.mu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!cs.widener.edu!cs.widener.edu!usenet From: YOUNG@tattoo.cs.widener.edu (Rob Young) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Aplha vs. Pentium Date: 31 Dec 1992 20:06:17 GMT Organization: Widener News/Mail Gateway Lines: 44 Distribution: world Message-ID: <1hvjrpINN5i8@cs.widener.edu> References: <00965E8C.5E07CBC0@vms.csd.mu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: tattoo.cs.widener.edu X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20 In-Reply-To: 2760carpente@vms.csd.mu.edu's message of 31 Dec 1992 18:02:16 GMT