Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1205Re: id in parts
From: D. J. McCarthy
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:40
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:40
22 lines
1476 bytes
1476 bytes
M. Wiltink.a73A.telnr-015-138378 (wiltinkm@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl) wrote: > As far as I know, but I don't know and that basically means nothing, 80x86 > processors have no code anywhere except maybe on the housing that enables you > to tell the n'th chip produced from the (n+1)'th chip, or any other chip from > the same line. I've been reading this thread and have declined to comment on it so far mainly because I don't have a clue as to whether Intel does anything like uniquely ID'ing each chip or not. But if you stop to think about it, it wouldn't make much sense. EACH chip would have to get stamped just a *little* bit differently from each other chip, which would make mass production almost impossible and certainly send production costs through the roof. Even putting it in some sort of ROM section later (to be burned in at encasing time or something) would seem to me to be extremely cost-ineffective. But like I said, I really have no idea. -- D. J. McCarthy (dmccart@gomez.intel.com)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzBtuu.6t0@inews.Intel.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!dmccartReferences:
<BzAww5.CGD@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!dmccart From: dmccart@gomez.intel.com (D. J. McCarthy) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: id in parts Message-ID: <BzBtuu.6t0@inews.Intel.COM> Date: 16 Dec 92 00:40:05 GMT References: <BzAww5.CGD@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl> Sender: news@inews.Intel.COM (USENET News System) Organization: Intel ASTG, Santa Clara, CA Lines: 22 Nntp-Posting-Host: empyrea X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]