Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1248Re: 486SLC chip..NextStep on Cyrix
From: fred j mccall 575-3539
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 19:23
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 19:23
17 lines
1419 bytes
1419 bytes
In <QfARNru00WB6Ie02BI@andrew.cmu.edu> Faisal Nameer Jawdat <fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes: >sting@hfglobe.intel.com (Joe Bennett) writes: >> possibly tested much that was written for the 486 with its changes to >> the supervisor mode/exception handling/etc. because *there* *was* *not* >> *much* *out* *there* that a general PC user would use. >One somewhat related question: Did they test NT on it? Doesn't NT >require a 486? ( I could be wrong on this...) You are. Hardware target for NT is a fast 386 or 486. -- "Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live in the real world." -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec18.192352.1041@mksol.dseg.ti.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!mksol!mccallReferences:
<1992Dec13.060559.3867@en.ecn.purdue.edu> <Bz89I7.23u@hfglobe.intel.com> <1992Dec15.192635.1133@mala.bc.ca> <BzD3yJ.4pF@hfglobe.intel.com> <QfARNru00WB6Ie02BI@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!mksol!mccall From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539) Subject: Re: 486SLC chip..NextStep on Cyrix Message-ID: <1992Dec18.192352.1041@mksol.dseg.ti.com> Organization: Texas Instruments Inc References: <1992Dec13.060559.3867@en.ecn.purdue.edu> <Bz89I7.23u@hfglobe.intel.com> <1992Dec15.192635.1133@mala.bc.ca> <BzD3yJ.4pF@hfglobe.intel.com> <QfARNru00WB6Ie02BI@andrew.cmu.edu> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 19:23:52 GMT Lines: 17