🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1255

Re: Intel's new performance test iCOMP

#1255
From: LGV/MC
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 03:12
50 lines
2488 bytes
J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM writes:

>In <1992Dec18.112919.22234@fwi.uva.nl>, Stefan Sinnige writes:


>>I read in our local newspaper about a new performance test, to compare
>>Intel processors. The performance test is developed at Intel itself and is
>>called the iCOMP (tm) Rating. The results are as follows:

>>   i486 DX2 66 MHz               297
>>   i486 DX  50 MHz               249
>>   i486 DX2 50 MHz               231
>>   i486 DX  33 MHz               166
>>   i486 SX  33 MHz               136

     i486 DX  25 MHz               122

>>   i486 SX  25 MHz               100
>>   i486 SX  20 MHz               78
>>   i386 DX  33 MHz               68
>>   i386 DX  25 MHz               49
>>   i386 SL  25 MHz               41
>>   i386 SX  25 MHZ               39

     i386 SX  20 MHz               32

>>The test is developed to show which processor is more powerfull. But they did
>>not tell, how the test is performed, so I do not know what these numbers stand
>>for.

>>Can someone bring some light in the darkness .....

>I can tell one thing about their benchmarks--they clearly use the co-processor.
>Otherwise, the 486SX and 486DX numbers would be identical.  That's just come-
>thing to keep in mid if you don't anticipate using any applications which
>use the FPU.  For apps which don't use it (well over 90% don't), the SX is
>every bit as fast as the DX.

From PC Magazine, December 8, 1992:
"The current iCOMP index is made up of four weighted components: 16-bit
integer (67 percent), 16-bit floating point (3 percent), 32-bit integer
(25 percent), and 32-bit floating point (5 percent).  Those weightings
reflect Intel's best guess about the importance of each component in
applications over the next three to five years (the average system
lifetime).  But Intel expects to update the formula as new CPU
capabilities emerge (graphics and video are two likely candidates), and
as applications change (as more of them take advantage of 32-bit
technology, for example)."

The full article appears on page 31.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Dec19.031237.4870@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!boulder!ucsu!gonzaled
References: <92353.39992.J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!boulder!ucsu!gonzaled
From: gonzaled@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (LGV/MC)
Subject: Re: Intel's new performance test iCOMP
Message-ID: <1992Dec19.031237.4870@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
References: <92353.39992.J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 03:12:37 GMT
Lines: 51