Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1367Re: 486 vs. Mac Benchmarks
From: Michael Lo Ho Fung
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 11:56
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 11:56
39 lines
2696 bytes
2696 bytes
Iskandar Taib (ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu) wrote: : In article <1992Dec17.224200.22219@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> merrifie@cidmac.ecn.purdue.edu (Michael C Merrifield) writes: : > : > "Recent Studies Reveal 25MHz Is Now Faster Than 50MHz" : > : >"Ingram Benchmark Results, March 1992 - 25 and 33 MHz 040 Macintosh Quadra : >Outruns the 486 at 33 and 50 MHz." : > : >"This revelation is brought to you by the Apple Macintosh and the Motorola : >68040." The add goes on to say that Ingram Labs (an independent PC testing : >firm) compared the newest 040 Macs (Quadra 950 and 700) to several of the : >quickest 486 Windows PCs running the most popular applications for both : >Macintosh and Windows 3.0 (such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Wingz, PageMaker, : ^^^ Oh goody. Why not use go whole hog here and : use Windows 2.11? 3.1 is quite a bit faster : than 3.0. : >Persuasion and Illustrator) and measured the performance of "real world : >functions" (such as opening a file, scrolling, running a macro, performing : >calculations, etc.). : What else was in those machines? They probably put Trident cards in the : clones and used (slow) IBM VGA in the PS/2s. Please state what is the hardware config. of 486. Once a 386 with fast VGA card and SCSI-2 harddisk can run most ms-windows application faster than a 486 with dump vga card and slow IDE HD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Lo Ho Fung Michael Comp 'N' | == Internet e-mail address == | | Department of | University : ee_hflo@stu.ust.hk | | Electrical & Electronic Engineering | Oversea BBS : mlo@nyx.cs.du.edu | | The Hong Kong University | Local BBS : michaelo@gnct.com | | of Science & Technology | Radio Call Sign : VR2YJR | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan5.115644.9215@uxmail.ust.hk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!network.ucsd.edu!munnari.oz.au!hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk!uxmail!ee_hfloReferences:
<BzoBtM.6Jv@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel,comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!network.ucsd.edu!munnari.oz.au!hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk!uxmail!ee_hflo From: ee_hflo@uxmail.ust.hk (Michael Lo Ho Fung) Subject: Re: 486 vs. Mac Benchmarks Message-ID: <1993Jan5.115644.9215@uxmail.ust.hk> Followup-To: comp.sys.intel,comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Sender: usenet@uxmail.ust.hk (usenet account) Organization: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8] References: <BzoBtM.6Jv@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 11:56:44 GMT Lines: 39