Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1375Re: Simple CPU Questions
From: Matthias Kamm
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 17:08
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 17:08
12 lines
1053 bytes
1053 bytes
Dennis O'Connor (doconnor@sedona.intel.com) wrote: : : ] 486-DX,486-SX,487-SX is the same die but they use difference bonding : ] and package. : : This hasn't been true for a while. The Intel486(tm) SX is a unique die. : That was my understanding too. I'm curious, though, how much of the die size was shaved off when moving from the 486DX -> 486SX. Does the cost savings really translate to what Intel is charging now relative to the DX, or are the prices purely market driven (i.e. is the 486SX locked to the AM386-40)?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1icfb8INN7ht@hpscit.sc.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!matthiasReferences:
<DOCONNOR.93Jan5080312@potato.sedona.intel.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!matthias From: matthias@nsr.hp.com (Matthias Kamm) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Simple CPU Questions Date: 5 Jan 1993 17:08:56 GMT Organization: Hewlett Packard Santa Clara Site Lines: 12 Distribution: usa Message-ID: <1icfb8INN7ht@hpscit.sc.hp.com> References: <DOCONNOR.93Jan5080312@potato.sedona.intel.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: hpmvd069.nsr.hp.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.2 PL7]