Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1402Re: Simple CPU Questions
From: Harald Milz
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 17:45
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 17:45
14 lines
1085 bytes
1085 bytes
|> I believe the first 486SX chips *were* in fact 486DX chips with the copro |> disabled. Intel used another design in later versions of the SX |> Yes, Leo. Actually, Intel had problems with their early 486DX's that wouldn't work even at 25 MHz. They un-bonded the copro and named it 486SX. Today, it's intended to beat the Am386-40. -- | iX | Harald Milz | email: hm@ix.de | | Multiuser | Editor | phone +49 511 547 47 66 | | Multitasking | Helstorfer Str. 7 | fax +49 511 547 47 33 | | Magazine | D-3000 Hannover 61 |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan7.174517.27553@opus40.ix.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!rz.uni-hildesheim.de!ix.de!hmReferences:
<72263@cup.portal.com> <1993Jan5.121048.9355@uxmail.ust.hk> <1993Jan5.212031.29177@ptdcs2.intel.com> <1993Jan6.151714.14179@rulway.LeidenUniv.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!rz.uni-hildesheim.de!ix.de!hm From: hm@opus40.ix.de (Harald Milz) Subject: Re: Simple CPU Questions Message-ID: <1993Jan7.174517.27553@opus40.ix.de> Sender: hm@opus40.ix.de (Harald Milz) Organization: iX-Redaktion References: <72263@cup.portal.com> <1993Jan5.121048.9355@uxmail.ust.hk> <1993Jan5.212031.29177@ptdcs2.intel.com> <1993Jan6.151714.14179@rulway.LeidenUniv.nl> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 17:45:17 GMT Lines: 14