Re: Pentium to be Scrapped?!

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #1418

#1418

From: Thomas D. Barrett
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 19:27

12 lines
1173 bytes

In article <DOCONNOR.93Jan7094831@potato.sedona.intel.com> doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor) writes:
>This is an idiotic rumor. No part in the 960 architecture will EVER
>replace the x86 line. Where did you hear such lunacy ? 

There was talk about a year ago that the MP# pin wouldn't be static in
a 960-like part which would allow a 486 to co-exist with this part
which installed in the OverDrive(tm) socket.
-- 
|Tom Barrett (TDBear), Sr. Engineer|tom.barrett@amd.com|v:512-462-6856 |
|AMD PCD MS-520 | 5900 E. Ben White|Austin, TX  78741  |f:512-462-5155 |
|"No is yes, And we're all free" ---Tracy Chapman, "Why?"              |
|My views are my own and may not be the same as the company of origin  |

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan8.192720.20393@dvorak.amd.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!amdcad!dvorak.amd.com!tdbear

References: <1993Jan6.235812.18764@netcom.com> <DOCONNOR.93Jan7094831@potato.sedona.intel.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!amdcad!dvorak.amd.com!tdbear
From: tdbear@dvorak.amd.com (Thomas D. Barrett)
Subject: Re: Pentium to be Scrapped?!
Message-ID: <1993Jan8.192720.20393@dvorak.amd.com>
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Austin, Texas
References: <1993Jan6.235812.18764@netcom.com> <DOCONNOR.93Jan7094831@potato.sedona.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 93 19:27:20 GMT
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message