Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #142Re: 486sx questions
From: bigras
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 08:40
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 08:40
31 lines
1579 bytes
1579 bytes
In article <DOCONNOR.92Jul30130104@potato.sedona.intel.com>, doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor) writes:
>
> ifaq570@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Allen Kitchen) writes:
> ] Sorry bud, but to upgrade from the 486SX to the 486DX, you will
> ] need to buy an entire new motherboard. Reason for this is that the SX is
> ] a 16 bit memory bus, just like the 386. The DX is a 32 bit part, meaning
> ] the memory is set up to be 32 bits wide.
>
> ARG ! NO NO NO !
>
> Both the Intel486(tm) SX and DX have 32-bit external busses.
> The Intel486 DX has an FPU, the Intel486 SX does not. And the pinouts
> are a tiny bit different. If your 486SX board has the right stuff ( either
> a "Vacancy" socket or signal-routing jumpers ) you can upgrade
> it to an Overdrive processor ( equivalent to a clock-doubled 486DX ),
> or maybe to a DX.
>
> In contrast, I think the Cyrix "486" part has only a 16-bit bus.
>
>
> --
> Dennis O'Connor doconnor@sedona.intel.com
Maybe if the dummies who name intel products
could standardize their naming conventions
{ wait for the P5slx/2 } this type of confusion
would be less common.
Tony Bigras
ok
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul31.014039.617@mala.bc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!destroyer!ubc-cs!mala.bc.ca!bigrasReferences:
<1992Jul27.135047.13578@nstn.ns.ca> <76814@ut-emx.uucp> <DOCONNOR.92Jul30130104@potato.sedona.intel.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!destroyer!ubc-cs!mala.bc.ca!bigras From: bigras@mala.bc.ca Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: 486sx questions Message-ID: <1992Jul31.014039.617@mala.bc.ca> Date: 31 Jul 92 01:40:39 -0700 References: <1992Jul27.135047.13578@nstn.ns.ca> <76814@ut-emx.uucp> <DOCONNOR.92Jul30130104@potato.sedona.intel.com> Organization: Malaspina College Lines: 31