🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1iimlfINN7b1@hpscit.sc.hp.com> matthias@nsr.hp.com (Matthias Kamm) writes:
>Intel would RUIN it's relations with it's
>customers to cancel the chip now. 

Well... let's suppose that this chip was burning holes in PC Boards
and melting plastic ZIF sockets.  If so, then those customers are
probably already a little nipped.  Let's suppose that the only way out
of the situation is to delay the project for whatever reason and then
suggest that they wait just a little while longer for something
totally awesome and cool-running.  The customers are still a little
nipped, but if they are told that they won't have to do any
redesigning and that they get a little while longer to work out all of
their chipset bugs, then they might not be so nipped come introduction.

(Don't read anything in to any of this... I know absolutely nothing)

-- 
|Tom Barrett (TDBear), Sr. Engineer|tom.barrett@amd.com|v:512-462-6856 |
|AMD PCD MS-520 | 5900 E. Ben White|Austin, TX  78741  |f:512-462-5155 |
|"No is yes, And we're all free" ---Tracy Chapman, "Why?"              |
|My views are my own and may not be the same as the company of origin  |