🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1435

Re: 960 XA/MX Questions

#1435
From: Dennis O'Connor
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 13:32
23 lines
1395 bytes
guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris) writes:
]
] >	MC : core + FPU + MMU, mil-spec
] >	XA : MC	+ object-oriented tagged architecture, mil-spec
]
] I.e., the BiiN machines all used mil-spec chips? :-)

The chips the BiiN machine used ( past tense ) are currently
only available as mil-spec parts.

] >Note that none of the commercial parts are the same die as 
] >any of the military parts : that would cost too much.
]
] I seem to remember Steve McGeady implying that, at least in some sense,
] the KA, KB, MC, and XA all used the same die, even though the dies on
] the mil-spec versions might be more rigorously tested.  The XA may have
] an extra pin or so for the tag bit.

This was true in the past. I'm pretty sure it is no longer true.

--
Dennis O'Connor			doconnor@sedona.intel.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <DOCONNOR.93Jan9133220@potato.sedona.intel.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!asuvax!chnews!chnews!doconnor
References: <1993Jan08.173711.14431@donau.et.tudelft.nl> <1993Jan8.215944.10065@gandalf.ca> <DOCONNOR.93Jan8234804@potato.sedona.intel.com> <16313@auspex-gw.auspex.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!asuvax!chnews!chnews!doconnor
From: doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: 960 XA/MX Questions
Date: 9 Jan 93 13:32:20
Organization: Intel i960(tm) Architecture
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <DOCONNOR.93Jan9133220@potato.sedona.intel.com>
References: <1993Jan08.173711.14431@donau.et.tudelft.nl>
 <1993Jan8.215944.10065@gandalf.ca>
 <DOCONNOR.93Jan8234804@potato.sedona.intel.com>
 <16313@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: potato.intel.com
In-reply-to: guy@Auspex.COM's message of 9 Jan 93 19:31:11 GMT