Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1435Re: 960 XA/MX Questions
From: Dennis O'Connor
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 13:32
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 13:32
23 lines
1395 bytes
1395 bytes
guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris) writes: ] ] > MC : core + FPU + MMU, mil-spec ] > XA : MC + object-oriented tagged architecture, mil-spec ] ] I.e., the BiiN machines all used mil-spec chips? :-) The chips the BiiN machine used ( past tense ) are currently only available as mil-spec parts. ] >Note that none of the commercial parts are the same die as ] >any of the military parts : that would cost too much. ] ] I seem to remember Steve McGeady implying that, at least in some sense, ] the KA, KB, MC, and XA all used the same die, even though the dies on ] the mil-spec versions might be more rigorously tested. The XA may have ] an extra pin or so for the tag bit. This was true in the past. I'm pretty sure it is no longer true. -- Dennis O'Connor doconnor@sedona.intel.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DOCONNOR.93Jan9133220@potato.sedona.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!asuvax!chnews!chnews!doconnorReferences:
<1993Jan08.173711.14431@donau.et.tudelft.nl> <1993Jan8.215944.10065@gandalf.ca> <DOCONNOR.93Jan8234804@potato.sedona.intel.com> <16313@auspex-gw.auspex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!asuvax!chnews!chnews!doconnor From: doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: 960 XA/MX Questions Date: 9 Jan 93 13:32:20 Organization: Intel i960(tm) Architecture Lines: 23 Message-ID: <DOCONNOR.93Jan9133220@potato.sedona.intel.com> References: <1993Jan08.173711.14431@donau.et.tudelft.nl> <1993Jan8.215944.10065@gandalf.ca> <DOCONNOR.93Jan8234804@potato.sedona.intel.com> <16313@auspex-gw.auspex.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: potato.intel.com In-reply-to: guy@Auspex.COM's message of 9 Jan 93 19:31:11 GMT