Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1444Re: 486SL dropped, vendors test Cyrix
From: Bill Henning
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 21:27
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 21:27
47 lines
2613 bytes
2613 bytes
In article <C0HsJp.ALy@inews.Intel.COM> rskinner@mipos2.intel.com (Rod Skinner) writes: > >Machine Processor/MHz SYSmark92 >Compaq LTE Lite/25c Intel386 sl-25MHz 51.90 >NEC PowerMate 3x25a Intel386 sx-25MHz 51.60 >PC Brand LeaderBook 486LC/25 Cyrix 486slc-25MHz 48.69 >TI TravelMate WinSLC Cyrix 486slc-25MHz 47.23 >Aspen Personal 486 Cyrix 486slc-25MHz 43.65 >Keydata Keynote 486slc-25 Cyrix 486slc-25MHz 43.55 >Compaq Prolinea 3/25 2s Intel386 sx-25MHz 41.35 ** >Micro Express NB486slc/25 Cyrix 486slc-25MHz 41.15 >Grid 1755/486slc Cyrix 486slc-25MHz 37.31 > >** no cache (on or off chip) A SYSmark92 of 48.69 for the PC Brand LeaderBook 486LC/25 (the fastest 486SLC figure you posted) vs. the SYSmark92 of 51.90 for the Compaq LTE Lite/25c (486SL) makes for a difference of about 7%. This is somewhat misleading, as this is not a purely CPU benchmark. >It just means that you need to be careful when buying a machine that has >the numbers "486" on the name plate. The system may have 486 in the >name and may execute "all the 486 instructions" but the thing that is >missing is 486 performance. That may change for the Cyrix 486DLC but I >don't have any application performance results that would allow me to >may any conclusions other than to expect Cyrix 486DLC performance >similar to the Intel386 DX at equivalent frequencies. Rod, I can't let that pass without a comment. Intel builds some truly excellent CPU's, and I am looking forward to the Pentium (R) but please do not equate a Cyrix 486DLC with an Intel 386DX at the same clock speed. Even a 486SLC beats a 386DX at the same clock speed according to some benchmarks I've seen. I believe that a 486DX, or SX, or SL is faster then the 486DLC at the same clock speed - makes a lot of sense, 8k cache vs. 1k cache ought to mean 80%+ hit ratio vs. 60%+ hit ratio, but I refuse to believe that a 486DLC even with the only 1k cache will not beat a 386DX at the same clock frequency, probably by a factor of 2. >rod > >Rod Skinner I speak for myself only. >Intel Corp >2200 Mission College Blvd RN4-21 PH (408) 765-4474 >Santa Clara, CA 95052 FAX (408) 765-4920
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0nqAF.B42@wimsey.bc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!van-bc!bhenningReferences:
<C0E0zB.DwG@inews.Intel.COM> <1993Jan6.135936.23923@crd.ge.com> <C0HsJp.ALy@inews.Intel.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!van-bc!bhenning From: bhenning@wimsey.bc.ca (Bill Henning) Subject: Re: 486SL dropped, vendors test Cyrix Organization: Wimsey Information Services Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 21:27:51 GMT Message-ID: <C0nqAF.B42@wimsey.bc.ca> References: <C0E0zB.DwG@inews.Intel.COM> <1993Jan6.135936.23923@crd.ge.com> <C0HsJp.ALy@inews.Intel.COM> Lines: 52