Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #146Re: 486sx questions
From: Tim Maceachern
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 13:29
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 13:29
34 lines
2210 bytes
2210 bytes
doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor) writes: >Both the Intel486(tm) SX and DX have 32-bit external busses. >The Intel486 DX has an FPU, the Intel486 SX does not. And the pinouts >are a tiny bit different. If your 486SX board has the right stuff ( either >a "Vacancy" socket or signal-routing jumpers ) you can upgrade >it to an Overdrive processor ( equivalent to a clock-doubled 486DX ), >or maybe to a DX. >In contrast, I think the Cyrix "486" part has only a 16-bit bus. >-- >Dennis O'Connor doconnor@sedona.intel.com Sorry to keep at this. Perhaps a FAQ is in order. It is my understanding that the current 487sx chip does not do clock doubling, and thus just adds an FPU to a 486sx system. What those of us with 486sx systems would like to see, of course, is a 487sx2 which gives us the clock doubling boost plus the FPU. I realise that Intel does not discuss unannounced chips and would not ask for that information, but exactly what is announced at this point? The BYTE add for July '92 claims "1.50X" performance using Windows with OverDrive (page 90). Is this FPU, new chip architecture, clock doubling related or merely a typical (or atypical) application performance difference? Thanks for any clarification. ******************************************************************* * Tim MacEachern * Tim_MacEachern@hawk.nstn.ns.ca * * Software Kinetics Ltd. * or maceache@hawk.nstn.ns.ca * * Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada * * * Opinions expressed are the author's only * *******************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul31.132914.167@nstn.ns.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!caen!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!nstn.ns.ca!fox!maceacheReferences:
<1992Jul27.135047.13578@nstn.ns.ca> <76814@ut-emx.uucp> <DOCONNOR.92Jul30130104@potato.sedona.intel.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!caen!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!nstn.ns.ca!fox!maceache From: maceache@fox.nstn.ns.ca (Tim Maceachern) Subject: Re: 486sx questions Message-ID: <1992Jul31.132914.167@nstn.ns.ca> Sender: usenet@nstn.ns.ca (NNTP Entity) Organization: NSTN Network Operations Centre, Nova Scotia, Canada References: <1992Jul27.135047.13578@nstn.ns.ca> <76814@ut-emx.uucp> <DOCONNOR.92Jul30130104@potato.sedona.intel.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 13:29:14 GMT Lines: 34