Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1479Re: Aplha vs. Pentium
From: Mounil Patel
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:00
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:00
10 lines
846 bytes
846 bytes
In article <id.Z5FW.P4E@ferranti.com> peter da silva, peter@ferranti.com writes: >Unless Microsoft seriously butchers NT, NT on a 386/16 will probably be >faster then a Pentium PC running Windows. :-> You're joking here, right? Or did you mean the Alpha chip instead of 386/16? Because there is no way you can actually mean what you said in the above lines. -Mounil
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1HBor.KzB@MathWorks.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!news.cerf.net!usc!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!hri.com!noc.near.net!MathWorks.Com!nuntiusReferences:
<id.Z5FW.P4E@ferranti.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!news.cerf.net!usc!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!hri.com!noc.near.net!MathWorks.Com!nuntius From: mounil@mathworks.com (Mounil Patel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Aplha vs. Pentium Message-ID: <C1HBor.KzB@MathWorks.COM> Date: 26 Jan 93 21:00:26 GMT References: <id.Z5FW.P4E@ferranti.com> Sender: news@MathWorks.COM (Usenet News Account) Organization: The MathWorks, Inc. Lines: 10 X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1