Re: Intialization of comp.sys.intel

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #1543

#1543

From: John Gilmore
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1986 19:40

13 lines
1221 bytes

In article <400@intsc.UUCP>, tomk@intsc.UUCP (Tom Kohrs) writes:
> My interest in this group will be to pursue discussions on the advanced 
> (no flames yet please) architectures that Intel is selling (ie. 286,386,
> 586, and 786)...
>         ...the 486 and beyond...

Sounds good to me.  Tom, can you start with a summary of the architecture
of each of these chips?  The only 586 I know of is the 82586 which is an
"advanced" but very buggy Ethernet chip.  Haven't heard of the 786 at all.
-- 
John Gilmore  {sun,ptsfa,lll-crg,ihnp4}!hoptoad!gnu   jgilmore@lll-crg.arpa
    "I can't think of a better way for the War Dept to spend money than to
  subsidize the education of teenage system hackers by creating the Arpanet."

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1295@hoptoad.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!hoptoad!gnu

References: <400@intsc.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!hoptoad!gnu
From: gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: Intialization of comp.sys.intel
Message-ID: <1295@hoptoad.uucp>
Date: Sat, 15-Nov-86 14:40:24 EST
Article-I.D.: hoptoad.1295
Posted: Sat Nov 15 14:40:24 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Nov-86 01:24:32 EST
References: <400@intsc.UUCP>
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message