Re: comp.sys.intel

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #1555

#1555

From: Daniel M. Frank
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1986 17:13

19 lines
1516 bytes

In article <110@wldrdg.UUCP> tony@wldrdg.UUCP (Tony Andrews) writes:
>Oh perfect. What a nice objective start we've gotten off to. Anyone
>who doesn't like intel products must be a 68K FANATIC and will tend
>to spout Motorola PROPAGANDA. My favorite propaganda is the stuff Intel
>puts out about segmentation.

   I think this sort of thing belongs somewhere else.  As I understand it,
this group isn't here to talk about whether the general architecture of
the Intel processor family is good or bad; that can go on endlessly in
several other groups.  I hope this is going to be a forum for much more
detailed technical discussion about the details of the architecture and
its development.  If it degenerates into religious wars, the technical
people (myself included) will quickly unsubscribe.  Please don't ruin
the newsgroup because you don't like the architecture.

-- 
    Dan Frank
    uucp: ... uwvax!prairie!dan
    arpa: dan%caseus@spool.wisc.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <354@prairie.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!uwvax!astroatc!prairie!dan

References: <110@wldrdg.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!uwvax!astroatc!prairie!dan
From: dan@prairie.UUCP (Daniel M. Frank)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: comp.sys.intel
Message-ID: <354@prairie.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 16-Nov-86 12:13:33 EST
Article-I.D.: prairie.354
Posted: Sun Nov 16 12:13:33 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Nov-86 20:31:46 EST
References: <110@wldrdg.UUCP>
Reply-To: dan@prairie.UUCP (Daniel M. Frank)
Distribution: na
Organization: Prairie Computing, Madison, Wisconsin
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message