Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1584Re: Intel 286/310
From: root
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1987 16:40
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1987 16:40
18 lines
1275 bytes
1275 bytes
When I used to work for Unisys, we had similar problems using Altos 986 family CPU's and their worknet. The problems that we had were that the machine that one was talking to throught the network would get overloaded, and the network server would get swapped out to disk, packets requesting information would time, out causing worknet to eventually fail. One potential option that you have, that might solve your problem is to add additional memory to your machines or ensuring that your server never gets swapped out by setting the sticky bit on it. Good luck, our final solution was to move to more powerfull machines! Daniel Corbett VP Engineering SDD
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<383@sdd.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!ut-sally!utah-cs!utah-gr!uplherc!nrc-ut!nrcvax!sdd!rootReferences:
<1777@a.cs.okstate.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!ut-sally!utah-cs!utah-gr!uplherc!nrc-ut!nrcvax!sdd!root From: root@sdd.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel,comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: Intel 286/310 Message-ID: <383@sdd.UUCP> Date: Thu, 26-Mar-87 11:40:45 EST Article-I.D.: sdd.383 Posted: Thu Mar 26 11:40:45 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Mar-87 07:28:57 EST References: <1777@a.cs.okstate.edu> Reply-To: root@sdd.UUCP (Root) Organization: Software Design & Development Corp, Camarillo, CA Lines: 18