Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1701Re: Info-Kermit Digest V7 #5
From: uucp
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1988 09:28
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1988 09:28
26 lines
1439 bytes
1439 bytes
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 88 13:53 MDT
> From: Joe Doupnik <JRD@USU.BITNET>
> Subject: MS-Kermit Under OS/2
>
> [Ed. - A question we're getting a lot these days is "Will (or can) MS-Kermit
> run under OS/2?" As far as 2.30 (and earlier) are concerned, the answer is
. . . . .
> physical hardware needs attention from the program. Rumors and the Microsoft
> Journal say that interrupt handler latency is very, very long on 286 machines
. . . .
> So, the short forms are: Yes, it runs now in the DOS box, but a full OS/2
> version needs a substantial development effort. The Presentation Manager specs
Conversation after reading this: (from memory):
me: Wasn't the '286 supposed to be so good at task switching??
dave: Hunh?
me: Well, it was supposed to have all these wonderfull instructions that made
task-switching so much faster and easier.
Dave: Right -- well dream on!
me: Yeah, it was, wasn't it?
--
-------------
Stephen Samuel
{ihnp4,ubc-vision,vax135}!alberta!edm!steve
or userzxcv@uqv-mts.bitnet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<222@edm.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!alberta!edm!rrootReferences:
<12372123605.195.SY.CHRISTINE@CU20B.COLUMBIA.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!alberta!edm!rroot From: rroot@edm.UUCP (uucp) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Info-Kermit Digest V7 #5 Message-ID: <222@edm.UUCP> Date: 12 Feb 88 09:28:59 GMT References: <12372123605.195.SY.CHRISTINE@CU20B.COLUMBIA.EDU> Organization: Unexsys Systems Inc., Edmonton,AB. Lines: 26 Summary: so much for fast task-switching