🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #172

Re: 486sx questions

#172
From: Tim Maceachern
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 14:52
45 lines
2586 bytes
wwitt@adara.intel.com (Wolf Witt) writes:


>To straighten out some of the confusion over the i486 family...

>i486DX	- 32-bit data bus, 32-bit address bus, built in FPU, built in 8k cache.

>i486SX	- Like an i486DX without the FPU. In other words, it still has the
>	  32-bit busses and the 8k cache.

>i487SX	- A flavor of the i486DX which can be plugged into the performance
>	  upgrade socket of an i486SX machine to add floating point computation
>	  hardware. Yes, this part essentially is an i486DX which shuts off the
>	  original i486SX when it is plugged into a system.

>i486DX2	- An i486DX with a clock doubling circuit, meaning that the chip
>	  internally runs at twice the system board's frequency. This part is
>	  currently only being sold to OEMs.

>Overdrive Processor
>	- This part is in effect the i487SX2 somebody was wishing for in a
>	  previous post. It is like an i486DX2 with the pin-out of an i487SX.

>I hope this helps. I know our naming strategy is confusing, but unfortunately
>nobody asked my opinion.

>Wolf


>Legal Stuff:
>i486DX, i486SX, i487SX, i486DX2 and Overdrive Processor are
>trademarks of Intel Copr.

>=> Wolf Witt, Design Engineer     <=> You say there is a bug in this chip?   <=
>=> x86 Focus Group, Intel Corp.   <=> No, no, you don't understand...        <=
>=> wwitt@smdvx1.intel.com         <=> This is a feature!                     <=
>=> I speak for myself, but nobody ever listens to what I have to say anyway. <=

EXACTLY the information I was looking for.  Thank you very much.
*******************************************************************
*         Tim MacEachern         * Tim_MacEachern@hawk.nstn.ns.ca *
*     Software Kinetics Ltd.     *  or maceache@hawk.nstn.ns.ca   *
* Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada *                                *
*           Opinions expressed are the author's only              *
*******************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug4.145202.11554@nstn.ns.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!ubc-cs!utcsri!torn!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nstn.ns.ca!fox!maceache
References: <1992Jul27.135047.13578@nstn.ns.ca> <76814@ut-emx.uucp> <DOCONNOR.92Jul30130104@potato.sedona.intel.com> <1992Jul31.132914.167@nstn.ns.ca> <12646@inews.intel.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!ubc-cs!utcsri!torn!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nstn.ns.ca!fox!maceache
From: maceache@fox.nstn.ns.ca (Tim Maceachern)
Subject: Re: 486sx questions
Message-ID: <1992Aug4.145202.11554@nstn.ns.ca>
Sender: usenet@nstn.ns.ca (NNTP Entity)
Organization: NSTN Network Operations Centre, Nova Scotia, Canada
References: <1992Jul27.135047.13578@nstn.ns.ca> <76814@ut-emx.uucp> <DOCONNOR.92Jul30130104@potato.sedona.intel.com> <1992Jul31.132914.167@nstn.ns.ca> <12646@inews.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1992 14:52:02 GMT
Lines: 45