Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #172Re: 486sx questions
From: Tim Maceachern
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 14:52
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 14:52
45 lines
2586 bytes
2586 bytes
wwitt@adara.intel.com (Wolf Witt) writes: >To straighten out some of the confusion over the i486 family... >i486DX - 32-bit data bus, 32-bit address bus, built in FPU, built in 8k cache. >i486SX - Like an i486DX without the FPU. In other words, it still has the > 32-bit busses and the 8k cache. >i487SX - A flavor of the i486DX which can be plugged into the performance > upgrade socket of an i486SX machine to add floating point computation > hardware. Yes, this part essentially is an i486DX which shuts off the > original i486SX when it is plugged into a system. >i486DX2 - An i486DX with a clock doubling circuit, meaning that the chip > internally runs at twice the system board's frequency. This part is > currently only being sold to OEMs. >Overdrive Processor > - This part is in effect the i487SX2 somebody was wishing for in a > previous post. It is like an i486DX2 with the pin-out of an i487SX. >I hope this helps. I know our naming strategy is confusing, but unfortunately >nobody asked my opinion. >Wolf >Legal Stuff: >i486DX, i486SX, i487SX, i486DX2 and Overdrive Processor are >trademarks of Intel Copr. >=> Wolf Witt, Design Engineer <=> You say there is a bug in this chip? <= >=> x86 Focus Group, Intel Corp. <=> No, no, you don't understand... <= >=> wwitt@smdvx1.intel.com <=> This is a feature! <= >=> I speak for myself, but nobody ever listens to what I have to say anyway. <= EXACTLY the information I was looking for. Thank you very much. ******************************************************************* * Tim MacEachern * Tim_MacEachern@hawk.nstn.ns.ca * * Software Kinetics Ltd. * or maceache@hawk.nstn.ns.ca * * Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada * * * Opinions expressed are the author's only * *******************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug4.145202.11554@nstn.ns.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!ubc-cs!utcsri!torn!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nstn.ns.ca!fox!maceacheReferences:
<1992Jul27.135047.13578@nstn.ns.ca> <76814@ut-emx.uucp> <DOCONNOR.92Jul30130104@potato.sedona.intel.com> <1992Jul31.132914.167@nstn.ns.ca> <12646@inews.intel.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!ubc-cs!utcsri!torn!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nstn.ns.ca!fox!maceache From: maceache@fox.nstn.ns.ca (Tim Maceachern) Subject: Re: 486sx questions Message-ID: <1992Aug4.145202.11554@nstn.ns.ca> Sender: usenet@nstn.ns.ca (NNTP Entity) Organization: NSTN Network Operations Centre, Nova Scotia, Canada References: <1992Jul27.135047.13578@nstn.ns.ca> <76814@ut-emx.uucp> <DOCONNOR.92Jul30130104@potato.sedona.intel.com> <1992Jul31.132914.167@nstn.ns.ca> <12646@inews.intel.com> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1992 14:52:02 GMT Lines: 45