Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #1921PLM vs. C for 80286/80386
From: Henk D. Davids PMSN
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 1989 16:35
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 1989 16:35
15 lines
989 bytes
989 bytes
Not trying to start another war, but I'm just looking for the relative merits of PLM versus C for programming our target machines that are based on Intel 80x86 machines. We use VAX/VMS systems for cross-development. I would appreciate any input that will help us to make a decision based on facts, rather than religion ... Thanks, Henk -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Henk D. Davids @ PHILIPS Medical Systems B.V., Dept. SWE-MTT Building QA-II / PO Box 10000 / 5680 DA Best / The Netherlands UUCP: hd@philtis.cft.philips.nl Voice: +31 40 762255
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<598@philtis.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!phigate!philtis!hdShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!phigate!philtis!hd From: hd@philtis.UUCP (Henk D. Davids @ PMSN) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: PLM vs. C for 80286/80386 Keywords: PLM C Message-ID: <598@philtis.UUCP> Date: 5 Jun 89 16:35:44 GMT Organization: Philips Medical Systems Lines: 15