Re: PLM vs. C for 80286/80386

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #1939

#1939

From: Peter da Silva
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 1989 14:41

16 lines
1004 bytes

One more point to make before I leave this particular subject. The PL/M
do-case construct is a ripe source of bugs:

In article <14391@bfmny0.UUCP>, tneff@bfmny0.UUCP (Tom Neff) writes:
[explanation of do-case]
> I tend to put padding cases at the end of my DO CASE structures just in
> "case":

> 		;;;;;;;;;;;	/*  insurance  */

I rest my case.
-- 
Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation.

Business: uunet.uu.net!ficc!peter, peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180.
Personal: ...!texbell!sugar!peter, peter@sugar.hackercorp.com.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4473@ficc.uu.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!texsun!texbell!sugar!ficc!peter

References: <598@philtis.UUCP> <14381@bfmny0.UUCP> <1765@auspex.auspex.com> <14391@bfmny0.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!texsun!texbell!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: PLM vs. C for 80286/80386
Keywords: PLM C
Message-ID: <4473@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 9 Jun 89 14:41:32 GMT
References: <598@philtis.UUCP> <14381@bfmny0.UUCP> <1765@auspex.auspex.com> <14391@bfmny0.UUCP>
Organization: Xenix Support
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message