i486 trancendentals

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #1981

#1981

From: Mike McNally
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1990 16:14

13 lines
878 bytes

What's this I read (in the i486 "shiny black" book from Intel) about
i486 trancendentals being aborted when a pending INTR is detected?
There's a vague comment about trancendentals being dangerous in
systems expecting frequent interrupts.  What's the real scoop?  Ken
S., are you there?



-- 
Mike McNally                                    Lynx Real-Time Systems
uucp: {voder,athsys}!lynx!m5                    phone: 408 370 2233

            Where equal mind and contest equal, go.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7102@lynx.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!daver!lynx!m5

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!daver!lynx!m5
From: m5@lynx.uucp (Mike McNally)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: i486 trancendentals
Keywords: interrupts abort
Message-ID: <7102@lynx.UUCP>
Date: 28 Feb 90 16:14:23 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Lynx Real-Time Systems, Inc., Campbell CA
Lines: 13