Re: 386SX vs 386DX

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #1983

#1983

From: Dave Newton the Late
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 1990 03:08

12 lines
995 bytes

In article <101@penrij.LS.COM> soup@penrij.LS.COM (John Campbell) writes:
>	dependant upon Intel Corp.  Of course, in Real (DOS) mode
>	a 386SX will be blown away by one of Harris's 200 MHz 286.

   Wow!! 200 MHz!!  Are you sure it's not that Chang-thing again?

   ;-D

-- 
David L. Newton                 |           uunet!marque!carroll1!dnewton 
(414) 524-7343 (work)           |              dnewton@carroll1.cc.edu   
(414) 524-6809 (home)           |           100 NE Ave, Waukesha WI 53186

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1263@carroll1.cc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!carroll1!dnewton

References: <1990Feb8.223250.17994@aucs.uucp> <101@penrij.LS.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!carroll1!dnewton
From: dnewton@carroll1.cc.edu (Dave Newton the Late)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: 386SX vs 386DX
Message-ID: <1263@carroll1.cc.edu>
Date: 2 Mar 90 03:08:19 GMT
References: <1990Feb8.223250.17994@aucs.uucp> <101@penrij.LS.COM>
Reply-To: dnewton@carroll1.cc.edu (Dave Newton the Late)
Distribution: na
Organization: Organization?  We don't need no steenkin' organization.
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message