Re: 386SX vs 386DX

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #2001

#2001

From: Larry A. Shurr
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 1990 17:12

15 lines
1165 bytes

In article <572@auvax.AthabascaU.CA> kevinc@cs.AthabascaU.CA (Kevin Crocker) writes:
}In article <101@penrij.LS.COM> soup@penrij.LS.COM (John Campbell) writes:
}}	the EISA bus-  Intel "fixed" the chip to favor IBM and hurt
}}	the EISA manufacturers).
}Will EISA bus be hampered by the 486 "fixes"?

O.K., I missed it.  What did Intel do to the 486 and what are the
implications for EISA?

regards, Larry
-- 
Signed: Larry A. Shurr (cbnmva!las@att.ATT.COM or att!cbnmva!las)
Clever signature, Wonderful wit, Outdo the others, Be a big hit! - Burma Shave
(With apologies to the real thing.  The above represents my views only.)
(You may now R'eply.  Forwarding from cbnews to my mail address now works!!!)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <14625@cbnews.ATT.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!cbnews!shurr

References: <572@auvax.AthabascaU.CA>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!cbnews!shurr
From: shurr@cbnews.ATT.COM (Larry A. Shurr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: 386SX vs 386DX
Message-ID: <14625@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Date: 9 Mar 90 17:12:00 GMT
References: <572@auvax.AthabascaU.CA>
Reply-To: shurr@cbnews.ATT.COM (Larry A. Shurr,20650,cb,9a110,6148605851)
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus, OH (actually an AGS consultant)
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message