🚀 go-pugleaf

How about this, jumpers every where as normal, but one jumper sets the
board as either "jumperless" or what ever the jumpers are set at.  Set
the default as jumperless for the dummies, us who know better only have
one more jumper to set, I can hack that, (if only the SB PnP cards had
the option).

By the way, as with SB cards, once the new type appears the old dies,
just try and buy a new non PnP SB16,  soon after this is introduced (if
it is), you won't have the choice either.

Bye

Gregory Seid wrote:
> 
> Mehmet Ozdemir wrote:
> > You ppl are paranoid, if you don't like the product DON'T buy it. But
> > for me this board is what i've been waiting for. I'm sick of changing
> 
> That's not the point.  Companies like Dell & Gateway are bound to latch
> on to something like this.  They know damn well that many people buy
> lower-end systems and overclock them (naturally, the corp's feel
> cheated).  I also think it's possible that Intel would opt for that PnP
> BIOS, not just BIOS-configurable jumpers (as is the actual case here).



-- 
|       Guy Barwood BSc (Maths)   3rd/4th Year Comm. Eng. RMIT
|         HomePage:  http://minyos.its.rmit.edu.au/~barwood/
|Scanning Service: http://minyos.its.rmit.edu.au/~barwood/esindex.html
|                    Email: barwoodg@ocean.com.au
|                       "Live Long and Prosper"