🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #205

Re: 486DX2 vs 486DX

#205
From: Ken Germann
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 01:10
21 lines
1191 bytes
In article <1992Aug7.023625.19775@schbbs.mot.com> P70008@WACCVM.corp.mot.com writes:
>We are thinking about purchasing a number of i486 machines and had heard
>about problems with the i486DX-50.  Are these problems solved?
>Should we go with a i486DX2-50/25 instead.  We will be using the
>machines as Workstations (most of them running Windows).
>
>If all is OK with the i486DX-50, why doesn't Compaq or IBM have any
>systems?...any and all comments welcome.
>
>-Bill

I have been running a ZEOS 486DX-50 for the last 6 months without any
problems. The two cooling fans in the case allow it to run without a
heat sync. Our case design runs the DX-50 well below Intels specs for
heat on the DX-50.

-- 
Ken Germann		support@zeos.com 	Zeos International, Ltd.
		   Opinions expressed are my own.	

	Press any key to continue.	Where is the 'any' key?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug08.011054.18976@zeos.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zeos!kgermann
References: <1992Aug7.023625.19775@schbbs.mot.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zeos!kgermann
From: kgermann@zeos.com (Ken Germann)
Subject: Re: 486DX2 vs 486DX
Organization: Zeos International, Ltd. 
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 01:10:54 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Aug08.011054.18976@zeos.com>
References: <1992Aug7.023625.19775@schbbs.mot.com>
Lines: 21