Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #205Re: 486DX2 vs 486DX
From: Ken Germann
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 01:10
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 01:10
21 lines
1191 bytes
1191 bytes
In article <1992Aug7.023625.19775@schbbs.mot.com> P70008@WACCVM.corp.mot.com writes: >We are thinking about purchasing a number of i486 machines and had heard >about problems with the i486DX-50. Are these problems solved? >Should we go with a i486DX2-50/25 instead. We will be using the >machines as Workstations (most of them running Windows). > >If all is OK with the i486DX-50, why doesn't Compaq or IBM have any >systems?...any and all comments welcome. > >-Bill I have been running a ZEOS 486DX-50 for the last 6 months without any problems. The two cooling fans in the case allow it to run without a heat sync. Our case design runs the DX-50 well below Intels specs for heat on the DX-50. -- Ken Germann support@zeos.com Zeos International, Ltd. Opinions expressed are my own. Press any key to continue. Where is the 'any' key?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug08.011054.18976@zeos.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zeos!kgermannReferences:
<1992Aug7.023625.19775@schbbs.mot.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zeos!kgermann From: kgermann@zeos.com (Ken Germann) Subject: Re: 486DX2 vs 486DX Organization: Zeos International, Ltd. Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1992 01:10:54 GMT Message-ID: <1992Aug08.011054.18976@zeos.com> References: <1992Aug7.023625.19775@schbbs.mot.com> Lines: 21