Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #2064Re: DX2-66 vs DX4-100 (AMD & INTEL) ?
From: Timothy Jehl -FT-~
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 00:00
59 lines
3125 bytes
3125 bytes
The following is based on personal observation and "feel" and has little to do with either actual benchmarks or company affiliation. In article <3st6cf$or6@net.auckland.ac.nz>, rajnishs@ccu1.auckland.ac.nz (Mr RJ Sharma) writes: > How do the following rate performance-wise with respect to > each other ? > > INTEL DX2-66 > AMD DX2-66 Theses two are essentially equivalent. > INTEL DX4-100 > AMD DX4-100 Thit Intel chip performs slightly better, but not a lot. They appear to perform about 30% better than the DX2s > PENTIUM 90 > A P90 flat out smokes a 486DX4. My best guess is another 40% performance increase when compared to either of the DX4 products. Not only is the Pentium an inherently faster processor (both integer and fp, but especially fp), the bus bandwidth to memory is much larger. > Is it true that AMD DX4-100 is similar to INTEL DX2-66 ? In the 486 lines, the INTEL and AMD parts are very comparible, with a slight edge to INTEL's DX4 over AMD's. The INTEL DX4 has a larger internal cache. Now, I suspect you have a reason for asking the question, such as getting ready to upgrade a system. If you have the appropriate socket, a DX4 is a reasonable choice, and far preferrable bang/buck over the DX2. Obviously, going to a Pentium would require a MB change, and now you start paying some premium for the new performance. If you're talking about replacing the mb anyway, or purchasing a new system, I would definitely, without hesitation, recommend going to a Pentium, preferrably on a board which uses the Triton chip set. Intel makes such a board (Zappa), but there are a couple of other mother boards out there with this chip set which work well. A possible alternative to the Triton chip set is the Opti set, but I'm not familiar enough with this chip set to make a recommendation one way or another. A motherboard with a P90, Triton chip set, and Socket 7 (not 5), will give you excellent performance today, and a good upgrade path. Once again, I recommend spending the extra couple of bucks for the Socket 7, so that you have an upgrade path to the higher performance chips, if and when they become available. You didn't ask about the 75 MHz Pentium, but my understanding is that it performs better than the DX4 as well (once again, especially fp), and is a bit cheaper than the P90. A 75 in the same board would still perform very well, and save you a couple of bucks to boot. TJ -- TJ Jehl tjehl@sedona.intel.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3t15lc$q2r@chnews.ch.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3st6cf$or6@net.auckland.ac.nz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110292,af96b7a0b78fa60 X-Google-Attributes: gid110292,public X-Google-Thread: 108c83,af96b7a0b78fa60 X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public From: tjehl@sedona.intel.com (Timothy Jehl -FT-~) Subject: Re: DX2-66 vs DX4-100 (AMD & INTEL) ? Date: 1995/06/30 Message-ID: <3t15lc$q2r@chnews.ch.intel.com> X-Deja-AN: 105418839 distribution: world references: <3st6cf$or6@net.auckland.ac.nz> organization: Intel Corporation newsgroups: comp.sys.intel,aus.computers originator: tjehl@sedona