🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #219

Re: 486DX2 vs 486DX

#219
From: Dennis O'Connor
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 00:24
30 lines
2066 bytes
schow@bqneh3.bnr.ca (Stanley T.H. Chow) writes:
] In article <> knauer@knauer (Rob Knauerhase) writes:
] >That's a neat trick; I thought you had to run Unix (which the i486 will do
] >acceptably) to have a workstation.  Using MS-Windows puts you clearly in the
] >toy market.  [cynic mode off]
]
] No, No. You have it wrong. Running MS-Windows give you a toy, running Unix
] just gives you an expensive toy that needs a sysadmin. Real work is done on
] mainframe with card readers.

No, No, No. You still have it wrong. If your monitor is monochrome 
inclusive-or less than 16" diagonal measure inclusive-or has a dot-pitch
greater than 0.31mm incusive-or the display adaptor has less than 0.75 
megapixels inclusive-or your computer takes more than 0.2 seconds to 
completely redraw it, you have a toy. Real workstations have at LEAST a 
16" color monitor with no more than a .31mm dot pitch on which is dispayled
at least 0.75 megapixels than can be redrawn in under 0.2sec; real engineering
workstations have at LEAST a 19" color monitor with no more than a .28mm dot 
pitch displaying at least a megapixel that can be redrawn in 0.1sec (altho
an exemption is granted to the last if you are running X-windows).

After all, the monitor IS the computer, really. That's why they cost so
much more than the same size TV, right ?

Sure I'm serious about this. Sure I am. Uh huh. Yepp. Really ! ;-)


--
Dennis O'Connor			doconnor@sedona.intel.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <DOCONNOR.92Aug10172400@potato.sedona.intel.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|inews!doconnor
References: <1992Aug7.024250.19969@schbbs.mot.com> <1992Aug7.185851.18347@infonode.ingr.com> <1992Aug10.195138.9727@ichips.intel.com> <1992Aug10.210658.18117@bcars64a.bnr.ca>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|inews!doconnor
From: doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: 486DX2 vs 486DX
Message-ID: <DOCONNOR.92Aug10172400@potato.sedona.intel.com>
Date: 11 Aug 92 00:24:00 GMT
References: <1992Aug7.024250.19969@schbbs.mot.com>
 <1992Aug7.185851.18347@infonode.ingr.com>
 <1992Aug10.195138.9727@ichips.intel.com>
 <1992Aug10.210658.18117@bcars64a.bnr.ca>
Sender: news@inews.intel.com
Organization: Intel i960(tm) Architecture
Lines: 30
In-reply-to: schow@bqneh3.bnr.ca's message of 10 Aug 92 21:06:58 GMT