Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #224Re: 486DX2 vs 486DX
From: Mitch Kahn
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 21:34
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 21:34
26 lines
1494 bytes
1494 bytes
P70008@WACCVM.corp.mot.com writes: Nntp-Posting-Host: waccvm.corp.mot.com ] ] We are thinking about purchasing a number of i486 machines and had heard ] about problems with the i486DX-50. Are these problems solved? ] Should we go with a i486DX2-50/25 instead. We will be using the ] machines as Workstations (most of them running Windows). ] ] If all is OK with the i486DX-50, why doesn't Compaq or IBM have any ] systems?...any and all comments welcome. ] ] -Bill ] I'm typing this on a DELL 450DE (486DX-50) worstation. This box *screams*!! Buy one, now! No kidding, it is easily the best 486 box I've seen. There are no problems with the 486DX-50. It just requires a bit of thought on the part of the system designers to cool it. (Just think about those 10 amp Alphas though). -- | Mitch Kahn | "I hope you know that this will go down on | | mkahn@sedona.intel.com | your permanent record..." | *************************MY OWN OPINIONS*********************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MKAHN.92Aug11143401@hopi.sedona.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|inews!mkahnReferences:
<1992Aug7.023625.19775@schbbs.mot.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|inews!mkahn From: mkahn@hopi.sedona.intel.com (Mitch Kahn) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: 486DX2 vs 486DX Message-ID: <MKAHN.92Aug11143401@hopi.sedona.intel.com> Date: 11 Aug 92 21:34:01 GMT References: <1992Aug7.023625.19775@schbbs.mot.com> Sender: news@inews.intel.com Organization: i960 New Product Development Lines: 26 In-reply-to: P70008@WACCVM.corp.mot.com's message of 7 Aug 92 02:17:51 GMT