Re: Why does SNOOPER indicate my P166 is a P150?

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #2255

#2255

From: Mike
Date: Wed, 08 May 1996 00:00

10 lines
1012 bytes

In article <831575130snz@longley.demon.co.uk>
           David@longley.demon.co.uk "David Longley" writes:

> Why  does SNOOPER indicate by P166 is a P150? MFT and  NORTON  SI 
> both say it's a P166.

How old is your version of SNOOPER? Did they make P166s at the time?

Mike

Technical Details

Message-ID: <831557970snz@myth.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <831575130snz@longley.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10c6a1,38efe36164305ab3
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c6a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,38efe36164305ab3
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
X-Google-Thread: 110292,38efe36164305ab3
X-Google-Attributes: gid110292,public
From: Mike <zeus@myth.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Why does SNOOPER indicate my P166 is a P150?
Date: 1996/05/08
Message-ID: <831557970snz@myth.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 153874204
x-nntp-posting-host: myth.demon.co.uk
references: <831575130snz@longley.demon.co.uk>
x-mail2news-path: myth.demon.co.uk
organization: The Home for Deranged Hackerfolk
reply-to: zeus@myth.demon.co.uk
newsgroups: comp.sys.intel,demon.tech.pc,comp.periphs

Reply to Parent Message