Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #23why not i586
From: Ronald Minemier
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 18:17
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 18:17
14 lines
821 bytes
821 bytes
i586 and intel586 are names that could be trademarked. one of the issues is that some other company can also tradmark a name like xxx586xxx this could be a problem to customers because the two parts may not actually be the same thing...close but not the same...most companies like their customers to get exactly what they already think they are getting. -- Intel, Corp. 5000 W. Chandler Blvd. Chandler, AZ 85226
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct29.181700.7121@ichips.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!cs.widener.edu!eff!iWarp.intel.com|ichips!rminemieShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!cs.widener.edu!eff!iWarp.intel.com|ichips!rminemie From: rminemie@sedona.intel.com (Ronald Minemier) Subject: why not i586 Message-ID: <1992Oct29.181700.7121@ichips.intel.com> Originator: rminemie@kirby Sender: rminemie@sedona (Ronald Minemier) Organization: Intel Corporation Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 18:17:00 GMT Lines: 14