Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #267Re: DX vs DX2
From: Mark Keisling
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 18:46
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 18:46
40 lines
2381 bytes
2381 bytes
twong@civil.ubc.ca (Thomas Wong) writes: > In article <1992Apr15.191222.25016@intelhf.hf.intel.com> jmaster@pcocd2.intel.com writes: > >There is a 50 Mhz 486 chip. 50 MHz inside and out. > > > >There is the DX2 series that will INTERNALLY (to the chip) double the frequency > >from 25 or 33 MHz to 50 or 66 MHz (respectively). External timings however are > >25 or 33 Mhz. Just pull the old chip out, put this one in. Now there is a > >new setup using a doubler chip, and I don't know much of anythign about this > >setup. It does NOT use the Weitek socket (If I understand this correctly). > >The board manufacturers will have to put a second socket on board. > > > > Didn't I read somewhere that Intel is coming out with a chip that can > sit in the Weitek socket? So that it can offload work from the main > cpu? And doubles the speed of the system? This is meant as an upgrade > offer for the existing 486s out there. Didn't anyone else read something > like this? Thanks. > > Thomas. > The upgrade path that Intel is recommending is for the motherboard manufacturers to provide an upgrade socket on the motherboard. This socket is different than the Weitek socket. Intel plans to put the 486DX2 in two different packages. One package has the identical pinout to the 486DX. The other package has a pinout compatible with their specification for the upgrade socket. This upgrade socket strategy started with systems built around the 486SX. The upgrade socket in these systems allowed an end users to upgrade to the 486DX. If you have a 486DX system that has a socketed 486DX, a compatible BIOS, and enough ventilation to keep the DX2 cool, then you could buy the 486DX2 and replace your 486DX with it. You can also try selling your spare 486DX. I have not heard of an Intel 486 that is pin compatible with the Weitek socket. Mark Keisling mdk@col.hp.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr16.184626.24134@col.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|ogicse!hp-cv!hp-pcd!news1.boi.hp.com!hpscdc!news.dtc.hp.com!hp-col!mdkReferences:
<1992Apr15.231515.9690@unixg.ubc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|ogicse!hp-cv!hp-pcd!news1.boi.hp.com!hpscdc!news.dtc.hp.com!hp-col!mdk From: mdk@col.hp.com (Mark Keisling) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: DX vs DX2 Message-ID: <1992Apr16.184626.24134@col.hp.com> Date: 16 Apr 92 18:46:26 GMT Article-I.D.: col.1992Apr16.184626.24134 References: <1992Apr15.231515.9690@unixg.ubc.ca> Sender: notes@col.hp.com (notes) Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division Lines: 40