Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #278Re: PLM vs. C for 80286/80386
From: Mike McNally
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1989 15:17
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1989 15:17
22 lines
1389 bytes
1389 bytes
In article <14395@bfmny0.UUCP> tneff@bfmny0.UUCP (Tom Neff) writes:
>In article <5711@lynx.UUCP> m5@lynx.UUCP (Mike McNally) writes:
>> [ things about PL/M, not entirely positive ]
>
>Truth Squad Dept.:
>
> [ corrections to some of my claims ]
Point taken. I did say that it's been a while since I used PL/M; I know
that 2.7 sounds like a kinda big version number.
I think a lot of the bad emotional feelings I have about PL/M stem from
having to use it on an old System III ("Blue Box") development system
with 8" diskette drives. I t w a s v e r y s l o w .
I can't say I ever got too fond of ISIS either. If I had PL/M available
under UNIX or something, I'd probably not mind using it at all.
--
Mike McNally Lynx Real-Time Systems
uucp: {voder,athsys}!lynx!m5 phone: 408 370 2233
Where equal mind and contest equal, go.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5732@lynx.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!vsi1!daver!lynx!m5References:
<598@philtis.UUCP> <126@tridom.uucp> <5711@lynx.UUCP> <14395@bfmny0.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!vsi1!daver!lynx!m5 From: m5@lynx.uucp (Mike McNally) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: PLM vs. C for 80286/80386 Keywords: PLM C Message-ID: <5732@lynx.UUCP> Date: 13 Jun 89 15:17:18 GMT References: <598@philtis.UUCP> <126@tridom.uucp> <5711@lynx.UUCP> <14395@bfmny0.UUCP> Reply-To: m5@lynx.UUCP (Mike McNally) Organization: Lynx Real-Time Systems Inc, Campbell CA Lines: 22