Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #325Re: INTEL 310
From: Carmen Hardina
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1989 05:09
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1989 05:09
44 lines
2731 bytes
2731 bytes
In article <124864@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> bender@oobleck.Central.Sun.COM (Michael Bender) writes:
>I haven't seen much activity (zero actually) on comp.sys.intel.ipsc310
>is there anyone out there that's got a 310 (running xenix or rmx) that
>may have missed this newsgroup and wants to talk about it? I've got a
>310 running xenix at home, and I'd hate to think that I'm the only person
>in North America doing this.... but maybe so.
>
>mike bender
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>michael bender - bender@sun (can't think of a witty thing
> 415 336-6353 (w) 415 941-3864 (h) to put here yet)
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
I use my SO's Intel 310AP. They are pretty good for C programming and the
like, but for CPU-intensive stuff they suck, like any 286 would I assume.
We have an Intel iSBC 286/12 CPU board w/1MB of RAM, iSBC 040EX 4MB RAM
expansion board, 2 Intel iSBC 188(56) intelligent I/O cards, Intel 214 disk
controller, Archive 45MB streaming tape drive, and a Maxtor 140MB hard disk.
It isn't bad for a 286, especially compared to ISA-type systems.
Got an upgrade to Intel XENIX 3.5 but haven't loaded it yet.
One interesting thing I found about the Intel XENIX 3.4 Development Package
is that when loaded on a SCO XENIX 386 2.3.1 system, will produce much
smaller, optimized 8086/80186/80286 XENIX (v5, not v3 like on the Intel box)
binaries than the SCO Development package. They also execute faster.
Has anybody ever gotten fixbb to actually fix a bad block and not screw up
some other part of the partition in the process? I think it worked once.
Anyways, please follow-up to comp.sys.intel.ipsc310...
--Carmen
--
Carmen Maria Hardina, Assistant System Administrator
INET: islenet!manapua!carmen@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu
UUCP: {uunet,ucbvax,dcdwest}!ucsd!nosc!uhccux!islenet!manapua!carmen
--
Carmen Maria Hardina, University of Hawaii at Manoa...
UUCP: {uunet,ucbvax,dcdwest}!ucsd!nosc!uhccux!bt455s39
ARPA: uhccux!bt455s39@nosc.MIL BITNET: bt455s39@uhccux
INET: bt455s39@uhccux.UHCC.HAWAII.EDU <-- It may work.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4874@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ames!uhccux!bt455s39References:
<124864@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!ames!uhccux!bt455s39 From: bt455s39@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Carmen Hardina) Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: INTEL 310 Summary: I use one. Keywords: intel 310 ipsc Message-ID: <4874@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> Date: 18 Sep 89 05:09:56 GMT References: <124864@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> Reply-To: islenet!manapua!carmen@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Carmen Hardina) Followup-To: comp.sys.intel.ipsc310 Distribution: na Organization: Manapua Public Access XENIX Lines: 44