Re: INTEL 310

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #331

#331

From: Tom Neff
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1989 15:04

16 lines
1205 bytes

In article <818@sdrc.UUCP> mustard@sdrc.UUCP (Sandy Mustard) writes:
>If your running unix on the 310 the best place for discussions would be
>comp.unix.i386.
>
>If xx-DOS then probably comp.sys.ibm.pc since the 310 is like a pc clone.

I can't agree -- there are 310-specific issues of interest to users,
especially configuration stuff which will be absolute greek to users
of ordinary XT/AT/MCA bus users.

Also Intel XENIX is not UNIX and does not require (or exploit) a 386.
It is a 286 + Multibus based product.  XENIX issues are of course
appropriate for the xenix newsgroup.
-- 
Tom Neff                                UUCP:     ...!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
    "Truisms aren't everything."        Internet: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET

Technical Details

Message-ID: <14716@bfmny0.UU.NET>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bfmny0!tneff

References: <124864@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <806@sdrc.UUCP> <124935@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <818@sdrc.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: INTEL 310
Keywords: intel 310 ipsc
Message-ID: <14716@bfmny0.UU.NET>
Date: 21 Sep 89 15:04:18 GMT
References: <124864@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <806@sdrc.UUCP> <124935@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <818@sdrc.UUCP>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff)
Distribution: na
Organization: ^
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message