Re: Why not INTEL586?

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #47

#47

From: Faisal Nameer Jawdat
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1992 20:17

3 lines
912 bytes

besides which, most peope who are going to buy a 486 for the 486
factor are going to know enough to know that a pentium is the next one
up

Technical Details

Message-ID: <sexAThS00WB5ADztcW@andrew.cmu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!think.com!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!fj05+

References:

<1992Oct28.103344.18434@nuscc.nus.sg> <1992Oct28.232419.26035@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> <1992Oct31.172830.28625@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <1992Nov1.225022.10123@umbc3.umbc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!think.com!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!fj05+
From: fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu (Faisal Nameer Jawdat)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: Why not INTEL586?
Message-ID: <sexAThS00WB5ADztcW@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 1 Nov 92 20:17:17 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.sexAThS00WB5ADztcW
References: <1992Oct28.103344.18434@nuscc.nus.sg> <1992Oct28.232419.26035@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> <1992Oct31.172830.28625@ultb.isc.rit.edu>
 <1992Nov1.225022.10123@umbc3.umbc.edu>
Organization: Sophomore, Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 3
In-Reply-To: <1992Nov1.225022.10123@umbc3.umbc.edu>

Reply to Parent Message