Re: Why not INTEL586?

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #50

#50

From: James Jones
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 15:56

8 lines
881 bytes

In article <1992Nov1.225022.10123@umbc3.umbc.edu> steibel@venus.cs.umbc.edu (David M. Steibel) writes:
>Therefore, with the Pentium increasing performance through the roof,
>people will be buying an awful lot of Pentiums.

Or is that Pentia?  Pentiae?  Assistance from people who took some Latin
would be much appreciated. :-)

	James Jones

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov2.155632.28732@microware.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcrware!jejones

References:

<1992Oct28.232419.26035@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> <1992Oct31.172830.28625@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <1992Nov1.225022.10123@umbc3.umbc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcrware!jejones
From: jejones@microware.com (James Jones)
Subject: Re: Why not INTEL586?
Message-ID: <1992Nov2.155632.28732@microware.com>
Summary: what is the plural, anyway?
Sender: news@microware.com
Nntp-Posting-Host: snake
Organization: Microware Systems Corp., Des Moines, Iowa
References: <1992Oct28.232419.26035@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> <1992Oct31.172830.28625@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <1992Nov1.225022.10123@umbc3.umbc.edu>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1992 15:56:32 GMT
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message