Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #611Re: Confused??? 486DX
From: Keith Smith
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 04:01
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 04:01
49 lines
2695 bytes
2695 bytes
In article <1992Sep10.034104.9879@nuscc.nus.sg> eletanjm@nuscc.nus.sg (TAN JIN MENG) writes: >davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen) writes: >: In article <14409@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>, s923257@yallara.cs.rmit.OZ.AU (Chew Ming Ean) writes: [...] > >On the other hand, EISA motherboards (in my country) cost about US$500 >more only. Plus you can upgrade to EISA peripherals incrementally. Gee "ONLY" a half grand. Ahem. Also forget anything but an EISA HD controller on an EISA M/B for anything but DOS. > >: >: I use both ISA and EISA, and EISA config is a royal pain in the ... >: ear. Under normal single user load, and particularly with DOS, you will >: be able to measure the boost, but probably not feel it. > >Yep. With DOS - not much diff in the normal case. One the other hand, >OS/2 and NT (and Solaris , and NextStep) are coming up. You might want >to get a [real man's OS ;-)] capable machine. Not much real difference there either. Most people don't buy SCSI-II disk arrays and such so the bus is not really a bottleneck. Expect to see onboard graphics stuff soon, and local bus for video, *OR* video coprocessor cards (My clone Distributor sells 2 now for Windows) that will again reduce the ISA bus bottleneck's significance. > >One of the very real limitations regards these 32bit OSes that has been >exposed by OS/2 is the 16MB physical addressing limitation of the ISA >bus. ie. the DMA controllers can only access up to 16MB of physical >memory. OS/2 on [most] ISA machines therefore uses only the bottom 16MB >for process memory and any memory above that for page cache! > Nah, OS/2 is just broken in this respect then. SCO & I beleive SVR4 reserve RAM <16MB for ISA DMA and copy up if need be. Pretty simple concept here IMHO. Then you can CRAM as much RAM as you want in the box and still use ISA controllers. Again, The bottlenecks aren't the BUS, but generally the DISKS themselves. >: bill davidsen, GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345 >: I admit that when I was in school I wrote COBOL. But I didn't compile. > >jin meng -- Keith Smith uunet!ksmith!keith 5719 Archer Rd. Digital Designs BBS 1-919-423-4216 Hope Mills, NC 28348-2201 Somewhere in the Styx of North Carolina ...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep12.040101.3180@ksmith.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rde!ksmith!keithReferences:
<1992Sep9.140731.21517@crd.ge.com> <1992Sep10.034104.9879@nuscc.nus.sg>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rde!ksmith!keith From: keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith Smith) Subject: Re: Confused??? 486DX Organization: Keith's Computer, Hope Mills, NC Date: Sat, 12 Sep 92 04:01:01 GMT Message-ID: <1992Sep12.040101.3180@ksmith.uucp> References: <1992Sep9.140731.21517@crd.ge.com> <1992Sep10.034104.9879@nuscc.nus.sg> Lines: 49