🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.intel
Article #696

Re: Difference between a 386 and a 386sx

#696
From: Peter da Silva
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 1990 17:15
22 lines
1298 bytes
In article <1824@Terra.cc.brunel.ac.uk> md89mch@cc.brunel.ac.uk (Martin Howe) writes:
> The SX motherboards are pretty much the same as DXs, performance-wise, *if*
> they're ISA BUS (16-bits) based;

Not so. Most 386DX systems have 32 bit memory on the motherboard, even if
they have an ISA peripheral bus. Many have at least one straight 32-bit
slot for memory cards (I don't know how standard these have become on
clones: Compaq has different versions for their 16- 20- and 25- MHz
machines!).

> On an EISA or PS2 bus,

Or ISA with 32-bit RAM

> a 386DX will win easily...

In fact the SX is just fine, even for UNIX, if speed isn't a big deal. It's
unacceptably slow for X, though.
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
+1 713 274 5180.   'U`
peter@ferranti.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <U:+5T_D@xds13.ferranti.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter
References: <1990Sep16.194605.11968@ecn.purdue.edu> <1824@Terra.cc.brunel.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: Difference between a 386 and a 386sx
Keywords: 386 386sx
Message-ID: <U:+5T_D@xds13.ferranti.com>
Date: 22 Sep 90 17:15:51 GMT
References: <1990Sep16.194605.11968@ecn.purdue.edu> <1824@Terra.cc.brunel.ac.uk>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Distribution: comp
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 18