386/486 SPECmarks (was: 286/386 clock frequencies, ...)

Article View: comp.sys.intel

Article #775

#775

From: Tom Haapanen
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 1990 19:16

14 lines
1123 bytes

bill davidsen <davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.com> writes:
> Note that the 486 is about 2.6 times faster than the 386 for most
> things, because the clock counts for almost all instructions have been
> reduced.

I keep seeing a wide variance in the 486/386 speed ratio: from about 3x
all the way down to about 1.5x (in PCMag benchmarks).  Have 386 and 486
machines been SPECmarked?  If so, how can I find out which manufacturers'
machines, and what the results were?

Thanks in advance...

[ \tom haapanen --- university of waterloo --- tom@mims-iris.waterloo.edu ]
[ "i don't even know what street canada is on"               -- al capone ]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Nov3.191613.26746@watserv1.waterloo.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!daemon

References: <1990Nov1.165539.1359@computing-maths.cardiff.ac.uk> <2832@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!daemon
From: tom@mims-iris.waterloo.edu (Tom Haapanen)
Subject: 386/486 SPECmarks (was: 286/386 clock frequencies, ...)
Message-ID: <1990Nov3.191613.26746@watserv1.waterloo.edu>
Sender: daemon@watserv1.waterloo.edu
Organization: University of Waterloo, WATMIMS Research Group
References: <1990Nov1.165539.1359@computing-maths.cardiff.ac.uk> <2832@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 90 19:16:13 GMT
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message